turn on moderation 
37931 answers matching: care
new search
"He claims I'm all alone on this but from the beginning, I've had people actually expose him for his stupidity." You haven't. Nobody cares about you.

TURKEY / SEP 22, 2017 5:45 PM EST

in response to: The Apologist's wisdom: "Like I said before, if [Trump] was a Republican, he would not make a deal with the opposing party. Name one president who has that was against the other party. You can't cause only Conservative presidents do that." Only on JC, right? 不不不不不不不不不不不不
"No, read very carefully, Mr. Alzheimer's: "Not only are there many more extensions, but more importantly, .org sites and .gov sites don't necessarily offer reliable, unbiased scholarly information." These extensions are not credible per se." Says who? You? You're the only one who thinks these extensions are not credible. Websites that focus on the study of something have one of those three extensions. .com is free researched information and is not credible. The others are.

UNITED STATES / SEP 22, 2017 12:19 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
"Those 3 extensions are credible." No, read very carefully, Mr. Alzheimer's: "Not only are there many more extensions, but more importantly, .org sites and .gov sites don't necessarily offer reliable, unbiased scholarly information." These extensions are not credible per se.

UNITED STATES / SEP 22, 2017 6:48 AM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
"Wow! You actually comprehended something correctly I'm really impressed. I'm so proud of you like how did you do it? Did you play the process of elimination game? Did you read it very carefully? did you look for guidance from Mark Pennington? Please share your ways of how you did it. I'm just... I'm really really proud of you. " Blablabla. Hollow words. Emptiness. 不不不不

UNITED STATES / SEP 21, 2017 4:24 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
"No, argument detected" Wow! You actually comprehended something correctly I'm really impressed. I'm so proud of you like how did you do it? Did you play the process of elimination game? Did you read it very carefully? did you look for guidance from Mark Pennington? Please share your ways of how you did it. I'm just... I'm really really proud of you.

UNITED STATES / SEP 21, 2017 4:22 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
You can get rich there, they have great health care and the best covfefe ever.

UNITED STATES / SEP 21, 2017 11:07 AM EST

in response to: Have you ever been to Namdia?
Obama didn't care.

UNITED STATES / SEP 21, 2017 10:39 AM EST

in response to: 9/11 collapse was a controlled demolition
Actually the worst thing about being a pedophile is the mind. No matter how hard a pedophile tries to fight the urges, it only makes them want it more and more. As the pedophile glances over a child and gazes into their eyes, they realize they have this tingling sensation to be with it. They want to caress the child's skin. Fondle their hair. Hold it tightly hoping to get to second base. The sad part... Second base never occurs. The pedophile has to force it. Cause it wants the child.

UNITED STATES / SEP 21, 2017 6:20 AM EST

in response to: What's the very worst thing about being a pedophile? Getting the little bitches' blood out of your clown suit
Am scared to touch it!!

UNITED STATES / SEP 20, 2017 11:10 PM EST

in response to: I like broccoli when it's raw. Its cold, crunchy, perfect with dressing for dipping. So, the other night, I left the lil lamp on, and the fuking thing exploded! The lightbulb that is... I still haven't taken the broken lightbulb out of the damn thing. Though I did unplug it.. Nor did I clean up the broken shards of glass... It's still there.
It scares me the way you wave it around.

UNITED STATES / SEP 17, 2017 11:25 PM EST

in response to: do you hate my shaft
I don't care whether you burp or not but I don't care to read about it. Grow up.

UNITED STATES / SEP 17, 2017 2:47 PM EST

in response to: I'm (burps!) sick! Today will be the first sick day I've taken all year...(doesn't soh express herself well?)
Here's a question for all of you. Is evil the absence of good or is good the absence of evil? It's just like the statement "black is not a color, it's the absence of light". What if light was the absence of darkness? The real question is though, if we're never going to find out until we die, why the hell do any of us care now?

UNITED STATES / SEP 17, 2017 3:24 AM EST

in response to: If God created us, then we must have been created not only in his image, but also as a part of him, as you cannot get something from the nothingness that existed. And if God is all good, then why is there evil in the world? (Subquestion) Is it possible that God is the perfect balance, equilibrium if you will, of all things?
It is connected to sin but Jesus already took care of that sin

UNITED STATES / SEP 16, 2017 10:15 PM EST

in response to: If god is omnipotent, how do explain the apple and the flood?
I don't think they're outright spying in terms of watching you through your webcam or anything. But they're definitely collecting data about your usage in order to market to you. They probably try to scrub it of identifying information, but it's been shown that even after this, the data can be put together to identify a person. So, be careful about what you use and let the companies you buy from know that you expect your information to remain private so they make their data security a priority.

/ SEP 15, 2017 1:50 PM EST

in response to: The Internet of Things refers to how many different things we use are now starting to have internet connections, such as smart phones, TVs, cars, houses, entire cities and even sex toys. (Cue shameless Buming and Slonder plug) Which begs the question: What does this mean for privacy, and data collection? Are all of the things we use spying on us?
U.S. President, military, tenure-track professorship, live-in babysitter/care-taker, foreign affairs official

/ SEP 15, 2017 1:39 PM EST

in response to: Where can I find a job that provides housing for me?
Aaaah feels good to be right what's that Mr. Liberal? You said Trump wasn't gonna be doing anything about DACA? I'm surprised your liberal NYTimes even made a post about it. Enjoy reading that buddy mobile.nytimes.com/2017/09/13/us/politics/trump-dinner-schumer-pelosi-daca-o
bamacare.html?partner=rss&emc=rss&referer=


UNITED STATES / SEP 13, 2017 12:06 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
No, if it can get in legal trouble why would you do that. Just gtfo of that place if it is. If it's petty drama wtf cares

UNITED STATES / SEP 13, 2017 5:32 PM EST

in response to: At school, this girl is lying about me and saying that I "grabbed her arm really hard" should I falsely confess to this?
Guess what? NOBODY CARES!!!

UNITED STATES / SEP 12, 2017 5:20 PM EST

in response to: Oh! Ugh... I've been cooped up all day at home. I don't like.
Yes he's getting rid of DACA and has the Democratic party's side on it. They are actually happy with him for this. As for visiting the wounded, Obama didn't even visit the victims of Hurricane Harvey while he was in Texas. So how does your comment "Not visiting poor victims will be devastating for their popularity" make sense if Obama didn't do it for the victims in Texas while he was in Texas. He obviously didn't care about his popularity.

UNITED STATES / SEP 12, 2017 5:07 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
I don't care what you saw, you *didn't present relevant evidence during our nondiscussions*.

UNITED STATES / SEP 12, 2017 1:38 PM EST

in response to: Donald J. Trump will soon be the Ex-President of the United States.
« Previous | Next »