turn on moderation 
4639 answers matching: google
new search
"No, 6:46, .com sites can publish scholarly information as well. Just google "what makes an information source scholarly", will you?" I didn't disregard the comment that .com websites don't publish scholarly information. I said they can be made by anybody. That means that .com website cannot link to another .com site. It needs to link to a scholarly article. If you keep digging through each article and none of the sources are not linked to a scholarly link, it's not reputable.

UNITED STATES / SEP 22, 2017 7:04 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
(When I said you should google "what makes an information source scholarly" just leave out the quotation marks so you can get more useful hits.)

TURKEY / SEP 22, 2017 6:57 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
No, 6:46, .com sites can publish scholarly information as well. Just google "what makes an information source scholarly", will you?

TURKEY / SEP 22, 2017 6:52 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
Why don't you google "What makes an information source scholarly?". Lots of criteria. "Always look on a .gov site or .org site" is not one of them. Quite rightly so.

TURKEY / SEP 22, 2017 6:18 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
"Google "bipartisan deal". And remember, Trump's deal has yet to go through. It's not a fact yet." Are we even on the same subject? It has yet to go through? The deal Trump made with the Democrats, they claimed it as a victory. Technically yes, it went through. Has the deal taken effect yet? No? So the claimed victory is not a sign because an agreed upon deal has yet to go through? The second they shook hands, the deal was made cause Trump is gonna go through it like he always does.

UNITED STATES / SEP 22, 2017 12:00 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
"Bipartisan deals never went through." Plenty of them went through. Google "bipartisan deal". And remember, Trump's deal has yet to go through. It's not a fact yet.

UNITED STATES / SEP 22, 2017 6:44 AM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
""scholarly/scientific/academic = .edu .gov .org websites" Genius!!! Is that what you think?! 不不不" look it up artard. When you copy and paste that into Google, you'll get websites that tell you the best search engines for scholarly scientific academic articles. Guess what? these search engines themselves are .edu or .gov or .org 不 you've lost credibility again buddy

UNITED STATES / SEP 22, 2017 6:35 AM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
5:42, this is what you said: "Give us all an example of one president that actually went against their own party. You can't cause every president was either Democrat or Republican." Bipartisan deals struck by presidents that went against the party line are not rare at all. Just google "bipartisan deal" plus the name of a president. Striking a deal that goes against the party line doesn't make you non-affiliated either. Who told you that crap? 不 不

UNITED STATES / SEP 22, 2017 6:32 AM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
.edu and .gov are rarely indexed by Google. That's why these website extensions are only indexed by search engines that specify these extensions only. Its all about the quality and number of inbound links. All sites, including .gov sites, must make sure they are part of a greater network. Are you aware of that, genius?

UNITED STATES / SEP 22, 2017 5:04 AM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
.edu and .gov are rarely indexed by Google. That's why these website extensions are only indexed by search engines that specify these extensions only. These are what people with a brain are required to use to make research papers. These research papers are not bias towards one side or the other. They are there for research purposes. You wouldn't know that though. Go argue with a professor about your ridiculous claims that Wikipedia is legitimate 不

UNITED STATES / SEP 21, 2017 5:16 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
It's a waste of money that only rich people could afford. Apple is becoming a Google and it's sad. iOS and Android are both stupid now but sadly you gotta choose only one of those.

UNITED STATES / SEP 20, 2017 6:15 PM EST

in response to: Thoughts on the iPhone X?
"Meanwhile, you haven't produced a list of Democratic, Republican and/or independent presidents yourself. Interestingly, all lists that I've come across put Trump in the Republican camp. All of them. Do you think there's a conspiracy going on against you? 不不不" Maybe I should go to Wikipedia and get a list of them for you. One second. Let me just go under the sources section cause that's so helpful. 不 let me not use Google cause I got Wikipedia sources 不

UNITED STATES / SEP 19, 2017 12:49 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
"But let's not fool ourselves. The reason why Google puts the Wikipedia page on top is because their list is deemed the most informative/comprehensive, not because it contains lies, lies, lies." lmao that's not how search engines work buddy Google puts it at the top because of many factors that are certainly not because they're credible lmfao. Have you never heard of Search Engine Optimization? Number 1 on Google is not always right. It's not always credible. Lmfao 不

UNITED STATES / SEP 18, 2017 5:39 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
(But let's not fool ourselves. The reason why Google puts the Wikipedia page on top is because their list is deemed the most informative/comprehensive, not because it contains lies, lies, lies.)

UNITED STATES / SEP 18, 2017 3:03 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
You're never too fat to get a bf, lol. It's just that men want an easy ride and if you look like work they won't. Then they get a satanists to help them get laid, for real. Google how men use magic to get laid

SOUTH AFRICA / SEP 8, 2017 3:48 AM EST

in response to: I really cant enter the dating scene again, lol, men are getting nasty. Even the way they look, I see couples of really hot girls with men that look really not good. As much as I lough while I type, it is so not worth it to date an ugly man that would kill you 40% of the time. What's wrong with women? lol, laughing so hard...
A lot of these people who hate other races make it known publicly. It's because they're not afraid. The only people who do it behind a screen are just trolls trying to get a rise out of people. Look up on Google "different types of trolls. There's a dedicated troll who uses race, religion, gender and so on just to get a rise out of people.

UNITED STATES / AUG 30, 2017 7:36 PM EST

in response to: Why are e-ngger-lovers so much of pussies that they have to hide behind a computer screen to say what they say? I guess its just genetics of their ancestry to be pussies
wp.lps.org/tnettle/files/2013/12/Liberal-vs-Conservative.pdf&sa=U&ved=0ahUKE
wid2JO-tf_VAhUFzoMKHfPhArIQFggUMAM&usg=AFQjCNEJjlNFY8x-ZAQ9VbiLxsk_gonLfA right there. Look at it. Look up on Google and other search engines what you're spewing about. You'll find absolutely nothing on your argument. Every fact I show you, has over thousands of sites agreeing with me yet I can't find one that agrees with you. How come? Explain that.


UNITED STATES / AUG 30, 2017 12:58 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
Google it, very strange.

UNITED STATES / AUG 29, 2017 11:16 PM EST

in response to: Mecha-Hitler.
The text I referred to just happens to offer quite some useful information in condensed form. There are lots of other texts dealing with this matter, but most of them are quite a read. If that doesn't deter you, you can look them up yourself. You know how to google, I suppose?

UNITED STATES / AUG 25, 2017 7:18 AM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
Don't do this. If you're struggling with anorexia, please seek medical help immediately. It's something that you won't realize until it's too late. Google "Instagram ghostinmypocket" prepare to be horrified.

UNITED STATES / AUG 24, 2017 8:09 PM EST

in response to: Is there a pro ana website on the internet? I want to give tips and get advice to be skinny. Are they all deleted or are there any left?
« Previous | Next »