turn on moderation 
11287 answers matching: leave
new search
Don't leave any bite marks.

UNITED STATES / SEP 23, 2017 3:31 PM EST

in response to: Should I bite Nelly?
If you truly love your husband, you'll stay with him and let him touch on any child he wants. What is wrong with you? You're a jerk for trying to leave him over something stupid.

UNITED STATES / SEP 22, 2017 9:09 PM EST

in response to: HELP!!!!! I just discovered that my husband is having abnormal fantasies on little girls. He would like to cum, lick, and kiss our futur daughter's pussy. He said that these things are emotional. I advised him to go to a shrink, but he refused. he is also attracted to young girls 15 12 13 14 16 years old girls. I am afraid he will act on his fantasies if I get pregnant and delivered a baby. I am lately thinking of divorcing him, because I cannot spend the rest of my life worrying...
8:13, i was willing long ago to have a decent debate. Dutchie somehow wanted to leave talking about the topics we were on, due to differences in political opinions. Then you came along and defended him. All well and good at the moment but then the way you were debating, pointing fingers, acting quite surreal about the topics we were on, you lost me wanting to debate with the likes of you. Things were fine until you showed up.

UNITED STATES / SEP 22, 2017 8:20 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 馃ぃ When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
The list is clear, containing "old, well-known" facts, as Dutchie said. Any vandalism would be immediately noticed. Besides, the page is protected. Plenty of sources are mentioned as well. We're good. Of course, you can try to prove that Trump is not the 19th Republican President of the USA. You don't seem to be willing to do so, though. So let's leave it at that. Matter solved.

TURKEY / SEP 22, 2017 8:13 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 馃ぃ When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
I actually answered Dutchie's questions. The problem here is how you both don't comprehend information. You read my messages, but you didn't look at them as if they had answers. You simply thought I was dodging which was never the case. As for you both being lovers, whatever you both do in the comfort of your homes is fine. Just leave me out of it.

UNITED STATES / SEP 22, 2017 7:16 PM EST

in response to: The Apologist's wisdom: "Like I said before, if [Trump] was a Republican, he would not make a deal with the opposing party. Name one president who has that was against the other party. You can't cause only Conservative presidents do that." Only on JC, right? 馃ぃ馃ぃ馃ぃ馃ぃ馃ぃ馃ぃ馃ぃ馃ぃ馃ぃ馃ぃ馃ぃ馃ぃ
(When I said you should google "what makes an information source scholarly" just leave out the quotation marks so you can get more useful hits.)

TURKEY / SEP 22, 2017 6:57 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 馃ぃ When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
He cheats on you once. You kept him around. He cheats again. You kept him around still. Now you cheat on him. Sounds like a real relationship to me. You both sound made for each other. Can't say he doesn't deserve it but that's not the point. If you have any decency in yourself, you'll tell him the truth. It's up to him what he chooses though. In all honesty, if he leaves over that, he's a hypocrite and needs to grow up. He's done it twice to you. You both disgust me.

UNITED STATES / SEP 15, 2017 11:18 PM EST

in response to: My boyfriend cheated twice, and we decided to try to fix things with counseling. We havent gone yet, and he went away for work. His friend came over today and we fooled around. I feel so much guilt I don't want to tell anyone because they are friends.
No. The definition is: horse路rad路ish 藞h么rs藢radiSH/Submit noun a European plant of the cabbage family, with long docklike leaves, grown for its pungent root. the root of the horseradish plant, which is scraped or grated as a condiment and often made into a sauce.

UNITED STATES / SEP 15, 2017 10:51 PM EST

in response to: Is horseradish an instrument?
No. The definition is: horse路rad路ish 藞h么rs藢radiSH/Submit noun a European plant of the cabbage family, with long docklike leaves, grown for its pungent root. the root of the horseradish plant, which is scraped or grated as a condiment and often made into a sauce.

UNITED STATES / SEP 15, 2017 10:51 PM EST

in response to: Is horseradish an instrument?
If you think you're going to lose her all you have to do is talk to her about your worries, but it all comes down to if you're actually ready to have sex with her. If you aren't, don't do it for all the wrong reasons. If you're really not sure about what to do, but are scared she's going to leave because of it, maybe suggest that you guys take it slow to start with so you can get used to the idea of losing your virginity. Ultimately it's completely up to you.

UNITED STATES / SEP 8, 2017 10:11 AM EST

in response to: So my girlfriend isn't a virgin and I am completely fine with that. I am however, and she doesn't want to take mine away, but as a person she is really sexual. We both really like each other but I'm scared she's going to leave me to "protect" me. I don't know what to do.
Don't be an ass, leave them alone.

UNITED STATES / SEP 6, 2017 1:14 PM EST

in response to: The girl I like has a boyfriend, he left the country but they are still together, is it worth trying something?
I remember the exact moment I realized it was time to leave the sex party and go home. It was 7:30 in the morning, and I was standing in front of a bunch of cots filled with piles of naked men. A man dressed in a leather jacket emblazoned with the words "human urinal" was next to me, a funnel strapped to his face.

UNITED STATES / SEP 3, 2017 3:35 PM EST

in response to: Where's the best place to go to be used as a human urinal?
""Many people fail to be objective, causing them to be unfactual virtually most of the time." I'm glad you admit to being unfactual for once." Did I admit anything? I didn't. When you quote someone, make sure you don't leave out crucial elements. Come on. You should know that by now. You're not *that* inexperienced, are you?

UNITED STATES / SEP 3, 2017 9:11 AM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 馃ぃ When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
Just rubbing sticks will surely not create a fire. You forgot to mention so many other necessary conditions. Whenever you state a fact, be *very* precise. Don't leave anything ambiguous and don't use loaded descriptions. Make sure that further interpretation is not needed. Also make sure that there is a common understanding if you refer to a thing or an act. For example, what does it mean "to be into something"? What do you mean by "liberalism" or "socialism"?

UNITED STATES / SEP 2, 2017 11:43 AM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 馃ぃ When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
Leave fat people alone.

SOUTH AFRICA / SEP 1, 2017 4:25 AM EST

in response to: Can you melt fat people to make soap?
Sugar and wheat are innocent. Crops of wheat are no threat to mankind and natural sugar occurs as an energy source in just about everything grow. "Carbon Dioxide, CO2, is absorbed by the plant through the stomata (small openings on the underside of the plants leaves) and water, H20, which is absorbed through the root hairs are combined together in a chemical reaction, which produces glucose, or the sugar that plants use for energy". Why avoid the natural?

UNITED STATES / AUG 30, 2017 5:17 PM EST

in response to: If people knew how dangerous, toxic and deadly sugar and wheat was all the shops would be closed by now. Modern sugar and wheat is white powdery substance just like many drugs out there. That should ring the first bell. Coffee, sugar and wheat are very quickly destroying us and they market it to the weakest of us, our kids(candy for your kids?).
They are like the band at school who the teacher would ask to leave as they are not taking battle of the bands seriously and are just mucking about and so they get my vote.

UNITED KINGDOM / AUG 26, 2017 5:17 PM EST

in response to: Watching At The Drive-In at Reading Featival. Are they big in USA?
Rastlin I know it's you, leave me alone

SOUTH AFRICA / AUG 25, 2017 5:35 AM EST

in response to: Have you ever worked your own clothes so they can be smaller? Pls advice me if I should use a machine or do it by hand. My clothes are falling off and I need advice how to make them smaller. We don't expect to be too small for our clothes, always the other way around aint it.
When you say a quote you explain it further. You don't just leave it up to the other person to have to ask question after question to get a simple answer out of you. For example: "Trump is banning transgendered people from being in the military" you could ask "but what does that mean?" then a simple and easy reply could be "it means that because Trump wants to save money for the military, he wants to lower the prices of what is costly for them by banning transgenders"

UNITED STATES / AUG 24, 2017 3:28 AM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 馃ぃ When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
I asked you to rephrase a quote. That's a specific question. Will you please rephrase the quote? I want then whole quote not part of the quote. The whole quote and yet you're again not doing that. You are looking for ways to not do that cause most likely you don't have a clue what it means. That's a failure on your own part. Take a quote and telling someone that quote in conversation and not explaining it just leaves everyone lost except yourself.

UNITED STATES / AUG 24, 2017 3:14 AM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 馃ぃ When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
« Previous | Next »