turn on moderation 
14842 answers matching: point
new search
Like I said before in the other thread, Turkey's questions will be answered when mine are. The fact that you're around though doesn't help the Turk at all. If anything, it's just making him look like he's got a lover. There's a difference between support and you. Support would say "I agree with Turkey. He makes solid points." you on the other hand, "way to go Turkmeister. I'm so proud of you buddy. You showed that guy off. Let me get you off babe" huge difference.

UNITED STATES / SEP 23, 2017 12:54 PM EST

in response to: The Apologist's wisdom: "Like I said before, if [Trump] was a Republican, he would not make a deal with the opposing party. Name one president who has that was against the other party. You can't cause only Conservative presidents do that." Only on JC, right? 不不不不不不不不不不不不
You didn't answer Turkey's question, 7:16. Turkey pointed out that when you notice somebody's got support from somebody else you call them lovers. Does that mean that people who are on *your* side should be called your lovers?

UNITED STATES / SEP 23, 2017 10:12 AM EST

in response to: The Apologist's wisdom: "Like I said before, if [Trump] was a Republican, he would not make a deal with the opposing party. Name one president who has that was against the other party. You can't cause only Conservative presidents do that." Only on JC, right? 不不不不不不不不不不不不
8:13, i was willing long ago to have a decent debate. Dutchie somehow wanted to leave talking about the topics we were on, due to differences in political opinions. Then you came along and defended him. All well and good at the moment but then the way you were debating, pointing fingers, acting quite surreal about the topics we were on, you lost me wanting to debate with the likes of you. Things were fine until you showed up.

UNITED STATES / SEP 22, 2017 8:20 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
"Again, nobody said it was impossible." Well, you did write, "You can't argue your point when you simply use a source that was written by itself." Aren't you trying to say here that a source describing its own functioning can't be neutral? I'm not talking about neutralities. I'm talking about statistics. I want statistics. These statistics are in the form of research. Opinions are not research they are opinions. I want the research.

UNITED STATES / SEP 22, 2017 7:32 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
"Again, nobody said it was impossible." Well, you did write, "You can't argue your point when you simply use a source that was written by itself." Aren't you trying to say here that a source describing its own functioning can't be neutral?

TURKEY / SEP 22, 2017 7:23 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
"You're talking about the white house written by the white house basically. You can't argue your point when you simply use a source that was written by itself." Are you trying to say that some .gov pages are not neutral? Interesting! You also seem to think that a neutral approach is impossible when an institution has to describe its own functioning. Let me tell you that that *is* possible.

TURKEY / SEP 22, 2017 7:03 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
"No, 12:39, that wouldn't be wise. Dutchie already showed you that whitehouse.gov/administration/president-trump, a .gov site, is not exactly neutral." This is how we know you're both reaching too much. You're talking about the white house written by the white house basically. You can't argue your point when you simply use a source that was written by itself. Until then, your points are invalid.

UNITED STATES / SEP 22, 2017 6:56 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
"What you need is scholarly/scientific/academic materials from, preferably, primary sources" hahahaha!!! 不 this stupid comment is just as funny as that one message you sent before! 不 scholarly/scientific/academic = .edu .gov .org websites 不 exactly what I've been saying from the beginning. You are by far the most retarded person I have ever met lmfao. 不不不 all you're adding in is "preferably, primary sources"不 you proved my point once again! 不

UNITED STATES / SEP 22, 2017 6:16 AM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
"Its all about the quality and number of inbound links. All sites, including .gov sites, must make sure they are part of a greater network. Are you aware of that, genius?" you got half of that right. It has nothing to do with the quality but yes it does with inbound links. You proved my point exactly there hence, why "research articles with these extensions are hard to find" they are usually "indexed by search engines that cater to these extensions" you cannot be that stupid can you?

UNITED STATES / SEP 22, 2017 6:08 AM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
What was the point of this question?

UNITED STATES / SEP 21, 2017 9:12 PM EST

in response to: Why are little white pussy boys on JC intimidated by the big massive cocks of black men?
"If I want to know the largest towns in Belgium, do you reallyt think I will have to go to a Belgian government site in order to get the correct answers? Don't you think that an encyclopedic source will do? Genius?" lmao look at how you flip flop from one extreme to another. We're talking about politics. Stick to a topic. If you're going to argue your point, you best use proper sources. If you just want information that could possibly be wrong, go to any website you want. That simple.

UNITED STATES / SEP 21, 2017 5:32 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
The way he responds clearly shows that he's a troll and you're just being retarded believing him. He does make better points than you do though and I hate Trump.

UNITED STATES / SEP 21, 2017 4:46 PM EST

in response to: The Apologist's wisdom: "Like I said before, if [Trump] was a Republican, he would not make a deal with the opposing party. Name one president who has that was against the other party. You can't cause only Conservative presidents do that." Only on JC, right? 不不不不不不不不不不不不
"Pweeeeep! Exit whitehouse.gov/administration/president-trump. Only Mr. Genius will think that this is somehow neutral and factual. 不不不不" lmao of all the websites you choose, you choose the one that talks about itself. The same website that said similar good points about Obama and Bush. It's hysterical how the only website you use for your argument isn't even a research website yet you were the one who brought up researching information. Lmfao 不

UNITED STATES / SEP 21, 2017 4:37 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
3:27, why post a different reply just to point out that somebody posts his repetitive crap again?

UNITED STATES / SEP 20, 2017 7:14 PM EST

in response to: What's the very worst thing about being a pedophile? Getting the little bitches' blood out of your clown suit
Stomach aches for two weeks should be presented to your doctor. It could be something youre eating for breakfast or it could be much worst. I would make an appointment, then in the mean time, I would track my meals, medications, etc.

UNITED STATES / SEP 19, 2017 1:43 AM EST

in response to: I have been having minor stomach aches for the past two weeks. They're not constant ones that last all day, they usually start after noon and end before 2:00 P.M. I have healthy bowel movements and no other pain or discomfort has come with this condition. Has anyone else been in this situation and turned out fine, or should I be concerned?
There's no point of your living if you don't know you were created because of love not by entertainment.

UNITED STATES / SEP 19, 2017 6:35 AM EST

in response to: What's the good of two strong legs if you only run away? And what use is the finest voice if you've nothing good to say? And what good is strength and muscle if you only push and shove? And what's the use of two good ears if you can't hear those you love?
"Have you never heard of Search Engine Optimization?" I'm afraid you've heard of it without knowing what it means. Wikipedia pages will always be at the top, with or without search engine optimization. It's what users looking for encyclopedic information expect to find at the top page. Now, if you think this particular page about presidents contain inaccuracies or wrong references, simply point it out. You can't, though. 不不不

UNITED STATES / SEP 18, 2017 6:21 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
I'm here to help Anti-Trump people understand how ridiculous they sound. They don't have any points as to why they dislike him. Most if not all people on this website just spew a little comment like "he's an idiot" well why is he an idiot? Or "he's gonna be impeached" well how is he gonna be impeached he didn't do anything impeachable. Then you got Mr. Quotes over here throwing in his 2 cents. More like other's 2 cents and playing them off as if he understands them.

UNITED STATES / SEP 15, 2017 11:31 PM EST

in response to: What is the meaning of life, why are we here?
He cheats on you once. You kept him around. He cheats again. You kept him around still. Now you cheat on him. Sounds like a real relationship to me. You both sound made for each other. Can't say he doesn't deserve it but that's not the point. If you have any decency in yourself, you'll tell him the truth. It's up to him what he chooses though. In all honesty, if he leaves over that, he's a hypocrite and needs to grow up. He's done it twice to you. You both disgust me.

UNITED STATES / SEP 15, 2017 11:18 PM EST

in response to: My boyfriend cheated twice, and we decided to try to fix things with counseling. We havent gone yet, and he went away for work. His friend came over today and we fooled around. I feel so much guilt I don't want to tell anyone because they are friends.
The universe is suspected to be spherical due to it expanding from the point of the big bang but some say it expands in a MASSIVE "multiverse", its like a bunch of universes floating around like bubbles. Some theorize that a connection is made when they "bump" into each other. What are all the universes inside of, I have no idea. Also, if possible, what happens when all the universes expand to where they must constantly touch?

UNITED STATES / SEP 15, 2017 5:21 PM EST

in response to: If the universe is constantly expanding, where do the edges go?
« Previous | Next »