turn on moderation 
10290 answers matching: reason
new search
6:38 read closely. Those 3 extensions are credible. .com and others such as .net are not. You can find maybe very minimal amounts of these extensions with legitimate information but your chances of finding even one are very slim. There is a reason informative articles have their own search engine.

UNITED STATES / SEP 22, 2017 6:45 AM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 🤣 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
"The one thing i don't understand is why it's so hard for you to grasp basic concepts." For the same reason you don't. Neither of us choose not to apparently.

UNITED STATES / SEP 18, 2017 6:18 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 🤣 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
"But let's not fool ourselves. The reason why Google puts the Wikipedia page on top is because their list is deemed the most informative/comprehensive, not because it contains lies, lies, lies." lmao that's not how search engines work buddy 👍 Google puts it at the top because of many factors that are certainly not because they're credible lmfao. Have you never heard of Search Engine Optimization? Number 1 on Google is not always right. It's not always credible. Lmfao 🤣😂

UNITED STATES / SEP 18, 2017 5:39 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 🤣 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
(But let's not fool ourselves. The reason why Google puts the Wikipedia page on top is because their list is deemed the most informative/comprehensive, not because it contains lies, lies, lies.)

UNITED STATES / SEP 18, 2017 3:03 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 🤣 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
Donald Trump is a horrible person. Give me one good reason why I should. Besides, I am atheist.

UNITED STATES / SEP 17, 2017 1:14 PM EST

in response to: You should worship Donald Trump instead of your God.
Please tell me how his tweets are innapropriate. I see absolutely nothing wrong with his tweets on the matter. What are you finding so innapropriate in those tweets? You know what I see? People reading too into things comprehending what they want to get out of his comments and twist them and turn them around on him cause they hate him for no logical reason.

UNITED STATES / SEP 13, 2017 1:10 PM EST

in response to: Donald J. Trump will soon be the Ex-President of the United States.
Because it's a mansion. It's made to survive this type of sht for a reason, a mansion isn't gonna be made out of paper

UNITED STATES / SEP 12, 2017 4:47 AM EST

in response to: Why did Trump's South Florida mansion survive Hurricane Irma?
"I asked for the reasons behind your quotes." You did not.

UNITED STATES / SEP 11, 2017 3:55 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 🤣 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
"I gave you the reasons why there is no intrinsic necessity to do so. You didn't address my comments, but just repeated yourself ad nauseam" I asked for the reasons behind your quotes. Usually reasons behind quotes in other words are called restated quotes. I quote something. What's my reason? "because I believe..." then restate the quote in your own words what it mean to you. It shows that you have knowledge on the topic. You fought me on it. Shows that you know nothing on the topic.

UNITED STATES / SEP 11, 2017 2:18 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 🤣 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
"Once you actually learn to do something someone asks of you, then you can ask me to do something too." Whenever you brought forward a reason why you think I should always restate quotes I gave you the reasons why there is no intrinsic necessity to do so. You didn't address my comments, but just repeated yourself ad nauseam, painfully displaying your Dunner-Kruger level of intelligence once again.

UNITED STATES / SEP 11, 2017 2:01 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 🤣 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
"How does this comment you made make any sense to what I asked you?" Oh, I forgot to answer your question? You asked me why I reposted your utterly stupid comment. The reason is that I like to expose your Dunning-Kruger level stupidity. Couldn't you gather that from my post?

UNITED STATES / SEP 11, 2017 12:12 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 🤣 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
If you think you're going to lose her all you have to do is talk to her about your worries, but it all comes down to if you're actually ready to have sex with her. If you aren't, don't do it for all the wrong reasons. If you're really not sure about what to do, but are scared she's going to leave because of it, maybe suggest that you guys take it slow to start with so you can get used to the idea of losing your virginity. Ultimately it's completely up to you.

UNITED STATES / SEP 8, 2017 10:11 AM EST

in response to: So my girlfriend isn't a virgin and I am completely fine with that. I am however, and she doesn't want to take mine away, but as a person she is really sexual. We both really like each other but I'm scared she's going to leave me to "protect" me. I don't know what to do.
I mean, seeing that the only people who replied in there were liberals such as yourself replying against me but the real mature ones (the republicans) never commented. It's honestly okay though cause we all know that you're debating skills are poor. In reality, we all just feel bad for you as you're making liberals themselves the (good ones) look bad and immature. There's gotta be an underlying reason why you're like this. Is it cause you couldn't explain your quotes?

UNITED STATES / SEP 7, 2017 1:27 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 🤣 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
It's not bad to share how you feel with people whether you are a guy or a girl. The only reason it's bad is because people themselves make it bad. It is known that people with emotions are easily controllable. If you can master both sharing your emotions and not being able to become manipulated and or controlled, then you're set. People just associate men with this trait to be weak when they're really not. It's called maturity. Something 85% of the world doesn't have.

UNITED STATES / SEP 7, 2017 9:16 AM EST

in response to: Is it bad for a guy to show his emotions openly to everyone.
I'm always right, although I don't know how to reason properly. Yes, it's sad.

UNITED STATES / SEP 6, 2017 2:24 AM EST

in response to: Did you ever declare yourself the winner of a debate by saying that the others know that you're right but dont wan't to admit it?🤣
"You can think what you want but we all know you really don't know how to reason and argue." Who is that "we" you're talking about. It's just you talking, nobody else.

UNITED STATES / SEP 6, 2017 2:42 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 🤣 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
You can think what you want but we all know you really don't know how to reason and argue. You have nothing else to say when I corner you and that's why you play the mocking game and yet you question my maturity just cause I say you and Dutchie are lovers. Lol that's extremely hypocritical of you but don't think too hard on the matter.

UNITED STATES / SEP 4, 2017 2:46 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 🤣 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
"You know my last message is fact." You still haven't learned anything about how to reason and argue properly.

UNITED STATES / SEP 3, 2017 1:33 AM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 🤣 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
"The fact that you clearly took a long time do so, gives everyone here the impression you cannot reason not come up with a logical explanation to each quote you provided." Huh? I pity the fool who's going to read this thread, but if they do they will find out I made it perfectly clear why it's absolutely useless to rephrase my quotes. Don't do things that are totally useless, people.

NETHERLANDS / AUG 24, 2017 7:02 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 🤣 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
Rephrasing the quote tells you understand it yourself. The fact that you clearly took a long time do so, gives everyone here the impression you cannot reason not come up with a logical explanation to each quote you provided. In other words, you lack comprehension when reading.

UNITED STATES / AUG 24, 2017 6:57 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 🤣 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
« Previous | Next »