turn on moderation 
11758 answers matching: speak
new search
Technically speaking yes she could but it would depend on how she lands as well as wether she is athletic or not & her over all health as a kid

/ SEP 22, 2017 10:22 PM EST

in response to: I'm writing a story and in the first chapter one of the main characters (she's 6) has to fall from a two story window and onto pavement. I just need to know if it's possible for a child to survive falling from that distance.
This is your mother speaking. I would just like to tell you that once you swoon her over to wear a condom before sexing. Hopefully the condom won't break and cause you to be stuck with a child you never wanted.

UNITED STATES / SEP 22, 2017 9:52 PM EST

in response to: Why does my crush smile/glance away whenever I catch her staring at me? She seems so happy to see me than her friends. Her friends are mean tho...
Hey everybody it's me. I came to check on the question and I'm curious what makes you Hillary lovers hate Trump so much? You all have failed to actually explain so. You have no answers. Your only brainwashed comments are that I'm stupid. Well explain how. Speak in specifics what makes me stupid or Trump terrible? Anti-Trump people have no answers. They speak in generals not specifics lmao. Poor communicators. Poor brains. Can't think for themselves.

UNITED STATES / SEP 21, 2017 5:50 PM EST

in response to: The Apologist's wisdom: "Like I said before, if [Trump] was a Republican, he would not make a deal with the opposing party. Name one president who has that was against the other party. You can't cause only Conservative presidents do that." Only on JC, right? 不不不不不不不不不不不不
"You haven't. It's not because people don't comprehend you, it's because you simply haven't backed it up properly." Coming from one person. You. You're the only one who can't comprehend. You're the only one speaking for everyone else. Calling everyone else stupid just cause you yourself can't comprehend. See that everybody? This person who fails to comprehend simple information is calling you all stupid. They don't understand that you guys have strong views. You're just stupid to them.

UNITED STATES / SEP 17, 2017 3:57 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
Speak and thy word shall be sovereign.

UNITED STATES / SEP 17, 2017 2:15 PM EST

in response to: Only the person holding the eagle feather may speak.
You are trying to learn soh speak?

UNITED STATES / SEP 16, 2017 8:27 PM EST

in response to: Popswobbo! TOY! Yodleyum and choco scrum with multi poppable ties! Ooooh, grubbly!
Speak for yourself.

UNITED STATES / SEP 15, 2017 9:20 AM EST

in response to: Look at state of dis place shows theit intelligents of JCers dont it ?嚜
What is that idiotic language that you speak?

UNITED STATES / SEP 12, 2017 1:43 PM EST

in response to: Howdy doo? 綽 Whatcha going right now?? I have to get ready to go out. I have to start my day!
How about you, Dutchie, and Mark Pennington all get together, go to a library and just study word origination. Study these 3 words (fact, opinion, claim). Get a dictionary. Oh wait a dictionary isn't fact. It's just a book that someone wrote who the rest of the English speakers decided to agree with. It's not a fact that these words when taught and learned, creates proper communication. Yeah you're the only 3 people out of billions of others who are right. Such geniuses!

UNITED STATES / SEP 1, 2017 1:23 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
I am sick and tired of people bashing those of us with a little bit of weight. We are normal like the rest of you. For us with such issues, it's a problem due to our metabolism. We can't control our hypothalumus. It's not our fault nobody accepts us for our flaws. For you skinny disgusting boney people, you need to grow up cause making comments like this is rude and it makes you look bad. Next time think before you speak. Read before you write.

UNITED STATES / AUG 31, 2017 7:26 PM EST

in response to: Obesity is dangerously unhealthy. Big Fat People should be shamed into losing weight. They should NOT be accepted and coddled. Do you agree?
"Interesting theory coming from someone who said it's anonymous. You're assuming I'm all alone on this. Numerous people have made comments to you but you assume it's just me." Ah, the "I didn't speak in this topic" with a twist. There were others in this specific thread talking to me? 不 不 不

NETHERLANDS / AUG 29, 2017 3:50 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
(Original Poster Speaking) Sorry, I meant the second responder. I was not paying attention. Also, I apologize for any inconveniences resulting from my bad joke. I wasn't trying to be too much of a troll

/ AUG 24, 2017 5:16 PM EST

in response to: Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like? I have been wonder for period of long time if has people anyone really has done it. Can you tell me how far has really any person been gone, that is, assuming anyone has been far really even as decided to use even go want to do look more like but once twice to negative not done maybe, because confusion over is me over about how why no anyone been go far look decided even can been more like go? Help?
(This is the original writer speaking) The first responder is half-correct. I DID answer somebody's question before this, but I was kinda' trying to confuse people. I hoping others would get the joke. The opening question is a copypasta from 4chan where someone made a post about a game that the OP of the thread claimed the 'First good game for the Nintendo Wii,' and someone made a comment asking that question. Original thread ID: 339217701 - view on boards.fireden.net

/ AUG 24, 2017 5:14 PM EST

in response to: Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like? I have been wonder for period of long time if has people anyone really has done it. Can you tell me how far has really any person been gone, that is, assuming anyone has been far really even as decided to use even go want to do look more like but once twice to negative not done maybe, because confusion over is me over about how why no anyone been go far look decided even can been more like go? Help?
"Didnt you speak on that question. I would have responded but by the time i wouldve, you wouldve changed the subject." What are you trying to say? One thing is sure, when I asked you what exactly it was what you didn't understand, you left my question unanswered: justcurio.us/PresidentTrumpsMilquetoastResponseToAProtestByWhiteSupremacists
ThatTurnedVi. A polite question that was left unanswered


UNITED STATES / AUG 23, 2017 7:29 AM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
Didnt you speak on that question. I would have responded but by the time i wouldve, you wouldve changed the subject. Please get back to me and answer politely this time.

UNITED STATES / AUG 22, 2017 4:00 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
Check out justcurio.us/answer/PresidentTrumpsMilquetoastResponseToAProtestByWhiteSupre
macistsThatTurnedVi. Look for the the text "Trump Apologist here ". That's you, right? Or... "didn't you speak in that topic"?


UNITED STATES / AUG 22, 2017 8:51 AM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
"Some people need clarification as to what they mean." If they do, they need to speak, especially when asked what part of which quote wasn't clear.

UNITED STATES / AUG 22, 2017 6:36 AM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
No no. Let them have their fun. It's not like they know how to hack anyway. Hacking requires a lot of coding and if the Trump hater can't comprehend information we give them, they certainly couldn't comprehend a learning video on coding. I mean we're speaking in simple terms. Imagine what coding would be like for them.

UNITED STATES / AUG 21, 2017 3:28 PM EST

in response to: I know for a fact that the resident Trump hater is a 400 pound fat slob sitting on their bed trying to hack into this site. Should we alert the cyber police?
There is a 400lb slob sitting on their bed, hacking this site as we speak.

UNITED STATES / AUG 21, 2017 3:21 PM EST

in response to: Statistics show that obese people tend to be of lower economic and educational status. Many of them require government subsidies in the form of welfare and food stamps so they can continue their disgusting habits. In many cases, middle class taxpayers are paying for Obamacare subsidies for big fat lazy slobs. How can we change this health and financial crisis?
Speaking of name calling, why do you have to call me anything? Now you're just being more of a hypocrite than before. Just call me sir and leave it at that. Speak to me clearly and respect me as well, and I'll do the same in return.

UNITED STATES / AUG 21, 2017 6:18 AM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
« Previous | Next »