turn on moderation 
113293 answers matching: thing
new search
12:02 why waste your time. This asshole isn't going to do a damn thing. Wise up.

UNITED STATES / SEP 23, 2017 2:57 PM EST

in response to: I'm going to kill myself this Christmas
Like I said before in the other thread, Turkey's questions will be answered when mine are. The fact that you're around though doesn't help the Turk at all. If anything, it's just making him look like he's got a lover. There's a difference between support and you. Support would say "I agree with Turkey. He makes solid points." you on the other hand, "way to go Turkmeister. I'm so proud of you buddy. You showed that guy off. Let me get you off babe" huge difference.

UNITED STATES / SEP 23, 2017 12:54 PM EST

in response to: The Apologist's wisdom: "Like I said before, if [Trump] was a Republican, he would not make a deal with the opposing party. Name one president who has that was against the other party. You can't cause only Conservative presidents do that." Only on JC, right? 不不不不不不不不不不不不
Lmao Turkey didn't do anything. All he did was ask questions that in the beginning I would answer and later after he wasn't answering mine, I wasn't answering his. That's a poor job. A hypocritical person at that. You keep sniffing his sack and fondling him as if you're in love with the guy. What is wrong with you weirdo?

UNITED STATES / SEP 23, 2017 12:49 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
Am like a huge butterball... I have to stop eating in the middle of the night, but it's going to be so hard cause I've been doing it for so long. I literally wake up, pig out, then go back to bed. And every night, I go to bed looking forward to sleep, telling myself here's another chance to not eat in the middle of the nite... then I do ... you know, munch. I have got to do something about this.

UNITED STATES / SEP 22, 2017 10:29 PM EST

in response to: Do you guys remember when I was thinner, like eons ago? Cause I do...
Anything that can prove him unfit for office? So... everything he's done while in office?

UNITED STATES / SEP 22, 2017 9:49 PM EST

in response to: I want that orange skinned nutjob removed from office. Is there anything...ANYTHING AT ALL that can prove him unfit for office, and hopefully impeached?
If you truly love your husband, you'll stay with him and let him touch on any child he wants. What is wrong with you? You're a jerk for trying to leave him over something stupid.

UNITED STATES / SEP 22, 2017 9:09 PM EST

in response to: HELP!!!!! I just discovered that my husband is having abnormal fantasies on little girls. He would like to cum, lick, and kiss our futur daughter's pussy. He said that these things are emotional. I advised him to go to a shrink, but he refused. he is also attracted to young girls 15 12 13 14 16 years old girls. I am afraid he will act on his fantasies if I get pregnant and delivered a baby. I am lately thinking of divorcing him, because I cannot spend the rest of my life worrying...
Nothing, dont expect others to fix your life. Take another walk or something.

GERMANY / SEP 22, 2017 8:37 PM EST

in response to: I didn't enjoy my walk. What are YOU going to do about it?
8:13, i was willing long ago to have a decent debate. Dutchie somehow wanted to leave talking about the topics we were on, due to differences in political opinions. Then you came along and defended him. All well and good at the moment but then the way you were debating, pointing fingers, acting quite surreal about the topics we were on, you lost me wanting to debate with the likes of you. Things were fine until you showed up.

UNITED STATES / SEP 22, 2017 8:20 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
"You also seem to think that a neutral approach is impossible when an institution has to describe its own functioning. Let me tell you that that *is* possible" Again, nobody said it was impossible. Did I say anywhere in my messages that any of this was impossible? No I didn't. I said if you're going to read on something, you cannot rely on the source itself. You have to use a researched topic on the matter cause that researched version of the topic is reputable.

UNITED STATES / SEP 22, 2017 7:10 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
There's another true thing Dutchie said. The matter at hand is whether Donald Trump is a Republican president or not. No thorough research is required to find the answer to this kind of question. So yes, check any tertiary source to get your answer to that question. Tertiary sources citing references are to be preferred.

TURKEY / SEP 22, 2017 6:33 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
Let me add something to my 5.45 PM comment. Suppose you had those people on your side, should we call them your lovers from now on, as you call other people's supporters lovers as well? How many lovers do you think you've got here?

TURKEY / SEP 22, 2017 6:02 PM EST

in response to: The Apologist's wisdom: "Like I said before, if [Trump] was a Republican, he would not make a deal with the opposing party. Name one president who has that was against the other party. You can't cause only Conservative presidents do that." Only on JC, right? 不不不不不不不不不不不不
"...it all started from a liberal licking his lover's balls trying to protect them..." Still the same stupid reflex? Somebody who says something about Trump you don't like is a liberal?

TURKEY / SEP 22, 2017 5:57 PM EST

in response to: The Apologist's wisdom: "Like I said before, if [Trump] was a Republican, he would not make a deal with the opposing party. Name one president who has that was against the other party. You can't cause only Conservative presidents do that." Only on JC, right? 不不不不不不不不不不不不
Why do we have to explain everything to you?

UNITED STATES / SEP 22, 2017 5:35 PM EST

in response to: DOTARD DONNY TRUMP IS A DOTARDED RETARD.
it's a sexual thing for sure. nop, my dear, you are not overthinking. pay attention next time.

SOUTH AFRICA / SEP 22, 2017 4:46 PM EST

in response to: If a man runs his finger down your spine, does that mean anything sxual? Basically if he says standing a certain way will hurt your back, and he demonstrates by touching? Is it sxual or is it just me overthinking? Thanks!
Your not overthinking. My wife weighs over 600lbs so running my finger down her spine does nothing but cause her back fat to quiver and shimmer a little. That kind of subtle physical contact turns me on immensely, so I guess it is sexual.

UNITED STATES / SEP 22, 2017 2:48 PM EST

in response to: If a man runs his finger down your spine, does that mean anything sxual? Basically if he says standing a certain way will hurt your back, and he demonstrates by touching? Is it sxual or is it just me overthinking? Thanks!
"You always have to check for more clues in order to be sure that information is reliable and unbiased. Don't rely on extensions. That's you take-home message, buddy." Here's your take-home message. Hopefully you'll learn something buddy. Extensions are vital to what kind of website it is. Is it educational? (.edu) is it backed up research by the government? (.gov) is it from a non-profit organization? (.org) .com at the end of the day, is free information anybody can share.

UNITED STATES / SEP 22, 2017 12:29 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
"No, read very carefully, Mr. Alzheimer's: "Not only are there many more extensions, but more importantly, .org sites and .gov sites don't necessarily offer reliable, unbiased scholarly information." These extensions are not credible per se." Says who? You? You're the only one who thinks these extensions are not credible. Websites that focus on the study of something have one of those three extensions. .com is free researched information and is not credible. The others are.

UNITED STATES / SEP 22, 2017 12:19 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
Lmao lets all take a deep breath since some of you need it. I feel bad for you 3 really. He claims I'm all alone on this but from the beginning, I've had people actually expose him for his stupidity. This is the same person who says "liberals and socialists don't have the same views"不 that they don't want the same thing 不 and claims he's not a liberal. He failed to answer simple questions. Why is Trump a bad president? He takes quotes and claims they're his opinion lol.

UNITED STATES / SEP 22, 2017 11:49 AM EST

in response to: The Apologist's wisdom: "Like I said before, if [Trump] was a Republican, he would not make a deal with the opposing party. Name one president who has that was against the other party. You can't cause only Conservative presidents do that." Only on JC, right? 不不不不不不不不不不不不
"Its all about the quality and number of inbound links. All sites, including .gov sites, must make sure they are part of a greater network. Are you aware of that, genius?" you got half of that right. It has nothing to do with the quality but yes it does with inbound links. You proved my point exactly there hence, why "research articles with these extensions are hard to find" they are usually "indexed by search engines that cater to these extensions" you cannot be that stupid can you?

UNITED STATES / SEP 22, 2017 6:08 AM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
"You dont need to do that. A *.gov site* did that before you, remember? Genius! 不 不 不" lmao this is how we all know your comprehension skills are poor. Read closely ok? I don't want you to hurt your brain though. Websites with .gov or .edu extensions are factual as they are used for research papers. Websites with a .com or anything else really, is only bias toward one side as anybody can make a website with these other extensions.you have so much to learn.

UNITED STATES / SEP 22, 2017 5:57 AM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
« Previous | Next »