turn on moderation 
9664 answers matching: trying
new search
If you truly love your husband, you'll stay with him and let him touch on any child he wants. What is wrong with you? You're a jerk for trying to leave him over something stupid.

UNITED STATES / SEP 22, 2017 9:09 PM EST

in response to: HELP!!!!! I just discovered that my husband is having abnormal fantasies on little girls. He would like to cum, lick, and kiss our futur daughter's pussy. He said that these things are emotional. I advised him to go to a shrink, but he refused. he is also attracted to young girls 15 12 13 14 16 years old girls. I am afraid he will act on his fantasies if I get pregnant and delivered a baby. I am lately thinking of divorcing him, because I cannot spend the rest of my life worrying...
"Again, nobody said it was impossible." Well, you did write, "You can't argue your point when you simply use a source that was written by itself." Aren't you trying to say here that a source describing its own functioning can't be neutral? I'm not talking about neutralities. I'm talking about statistics. I want statistics. These statistics are in the form of research. Opinions are not research they are opinions. I want the research.

UNITED STATES / SEP 22, 2017 7:32 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
"Again, nobody said it was impossible." Well, you did write, "You can't argue your point when you simply use a source that was written by itself." Aren't you trying to say here that a source describing its own functioning can't be neutral?

TURKEY / SEP 22, 2017 7:23 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
I don't know what you're trying to say, 7:04, but what I do know is that scholarly articles can simply be published on a .com site. Or an .it site. Or a co.uk site. Or an .org site. Or a .eu site. Any extension you can come up with..

TURKEY / SEP 22, 2017 7:08 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
"You're talking about the white house written by the white house basically. You can't argue your point when you simply use a source that was written by itself." Are you trying to say that some .gov pages are not neutral? Interesting! You also seem to think that a neutral approach is impossible when an institution has to describe its own functioning. Let me tell you that that *is* possible.

TURKEY / SEP 22, 2017 7:03 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
"...it all started from a liberal licking his lover's balls trying to protect them..." Still the same stupid reflex? Somebody who says something about Trump you don't like is a liberal?

TURKEY / SEP 22, 2017 5:57 PM EST

in response to: The Apologist's wisdom: "Like I said before, if [Trump] was a Republican, he would not make a deal with the opposing party. Name one president who has that was against the other party. You can't cause only Conservative presidents do that." Only on JC, right? 不不不不不不不不不不不不
"good job op" awe you guys are buttering him up how cute! What you all fail to realize is I asked why someone else who said he was stupid, he was this and that and that person failed to respond. So when your boyfriend Mr. Hero here thought he needed to protect someone, he butted into their business taking over for them. So here we are, it all started from a liberal licking his lover's balls trying to protect them and now you guys are doing the same for him.

UNITED STATES / SEP 22, 2017 11:42 AM EST

in response to: The Apologist's wisdom: "Like I said before, if [Trump] was a Republican, he would not make a deal with the opposing party. Name one president who has that was against the other party. You can't cause only Conservative presidents do that." Only on JC, right? 不不不不不不不不不不不不
checking back on this and well- my family is not exactly wealthy we are definitely not poor either but I have no money saved for college and yes that's obvious to work while in college but I'll still need money before then also you don't need to be so rude as to call me an "entitled snowflake" I'm just trying to be able to have a successful future apologies if I did come off that way it was not my intention

UNITED STATES / SEP 22, 2017 6:04 AM EST

in response to: Is there a way to legally get a decent paying job at 13? Ok maybe not decent but an okay paying one? College tuition won't pay itself
"We got Mr. Wikipedia with a bias "opinion" against .gov sites. Lmao you're trying so hard to make yourself sound intelligent yet all you're doing is digging yourself a deeper hole. 不 you're such a hypocrite lmao. " No, argument detected.

UNITED STATES / SEP 21, 2017 4:05 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
"Take this: whitehouse.gov/administration/president-trump. Written by Trump's people. Any encyclopedic article about Trump will do a better job at being neutral." Uh oh everybody. We got Mr. Wikipedia with a bias "opinion" against .gov sites. Lmao you're trying so hard to make yourself sound intelligent yet all you're doing is digging yourself a deeper hole. 不 you're such a hypocrite lmao. 不

UNITED STATES / SEP 21, 2017 1:20 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
Am you intelligent or are you just trying to be cute?

UNITED STATES / SEP 21, 2017 12:33 PM EST

in response to: Am waiting... am lirking.
You've got a lot to learn lmao. Wikipedia is unacceptable because anybody can edit it. Lmao 不 anybody with a brain would know that. Go ahead and edit the sources section too. Anybody can edit it. It doesn't matter how much information is true or not. You cannot use Wikipedia as a source. You said that. You sent a link to Wikipedia. Then you changed the topic to use the sources section lmao. You're reaching now 不 you're trying so hard 不

UNITED STATES / SEP 19, 2017 12:38 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
"My favorite part of all of this "make America great again" crap is we stole this Country, it isn't even ours." This is not the 1800s anymore. It's not the early 1900s either. It's a new system. WE didn't take it. OUR ancestors did. It's not we. WE, are trying to make America safe and in order to make that happen, WE need to make a system that works. We're in the here and now to protect us now and in the future. Stop going to the past. It doesn't help make us safe.

UNITED STATES / SEP 17, 2017 3:35 AM EST

in response to: Another attack in London by a loser terrorist.These are sick and demented people who were in the sights of Scotland Yard. Must be proactive! The travel ban into the United States should be far larger, tougher and more specific-but stupidly, that would not be politically correct!
You are trying to learn soh speak?

UNITED STATES / SEP 16, 2017 8:27 PM EST

in response to: Popswobbo! TOY! Yodleyum and choco scrum with multi poppable ties! Ooooh, grubbly!
What you are is a "compulsive liar". You've made a habit of lying and it comes naturally to you. If you've been correcting yourself then so be it! You obviously subconsciously don't like this attribute of yourself and you want to change. Now that you are aware then maybe you trying to change this about yourself will become successful!

UNITED STATES / SEP 16, 2017 5:20 AM EST

in response to: Most of the time in a conversation, I just outright lie about things for some unknown reason and you know what? I always follow through with it. I've been correcting my lies recently, but I sound crazy when I do. It's almost like I'm talking to myself. What is this called? Also, how can I stop?
I'm afraid that you're wrong. "This" spelled backwards is siht, not... the word s-h-癒-t. But I appreciate your efforts. Keep trying to anagram curse words.

UNITED STATES / SEP 15, 2017 10:47 PM EST

in response to: what is this spelled backwards? sht
Let me drop this as well: nationalreview.com/corner/451136/trump-has-not-ended-daca. Summary: "Trump is in a box because he likes DACA but opportunistically railed against it as a candidate. In trying to square that circle, hoping his core supporters wont notice the difference [...], his formerly thunderous objection to DACA has been reduced to a whimper over its formal legal niceties [...] . But the reality is: This president, like the last one, fully supports the substance of DACA."

UNITED STATES / SEP 13, 2017 9:14 AM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
So... what message are you trying to get across when you posted these links?

UNITED STATES / SEP 13, 2017 8:51 AM EST

in response to: Donald J. Trump will soon be the Ex-President of the United States.
6:18, what exactly are you trying to prove with your links? I already told you presidents have no choice but to visit hurricane victims. It's suicide not do so. And no, Obama didn't serve any soup in 2017. He served soup to the homeless in 2015. So what? He didn't tweet this message himself.

UNITED STATES / SEP 13, 2017 8:50 AM EST

in response to: Donald J. Trump will soon be the Ex-President of the United States.
"Trump is going to visit the people who suffered from Hurricane Irma." So did he do it? Then it's a fact. But what are you trying to prove with this fact? Do you think these visits make him a good person? Any president will visit American hurricane victims. They don't have much of a choice, do they? Not visiting poor victims will be devastatign for their popularity. Now that Trump's popularity ratings are extremely low, it would be suicide if he decided to just stay at home.

UNITED STATES / SEP 12, 2017 1:55 PM EST

in response to: The Trump Apologist has gradually become aware that you can't win an argument just by calling names. He can't live without calling names, though. So this has become his new logic: "Sore loser" can be used, as it merely means somebody who can't handle a loss. By giving a definition, presented by him as a fact, he thinks that calling someone a sore loser is no longer an opinion lacking any substance, but a fact as well. 不 When was the last time you heard some utterly stupid logic?
« Previous | Next »